|
They're Watching You.
A roster of office spies with code names SpyAgent,
Shadow, Silent Watch and Sentinel have infiltrated the
workplace, commandeered your computer and are looking
over your shoulder. They aim to sniff out corporate
cyberslackers, and by all accounts they won't have trouble
finding them -- Canadian employees are surfing the Web
at work in droves.
|
|
CREDIT:
Bruno Schlumberger, For Techweekly
Sundara Murthy, CEO of Ottawa's Sigpro Wireless,
is an outspoken critic of surfing at work. 'People
are spending lots of time on the Internet and it
is becoming addictive.' Instant messaging, he says,
is a scourge to productivity. 'Chatlines are a disease.'
|
A recent Ipsos-Reid poll
found personal Web surfing is increasingly common. Canadians
spend an average of 4.5 hours a week online at work
for personal reasons, according to the poll. That's
1.6 billion hours a year. Although the majority of Internet
use is legitimate, the jump in personal use -- double
that of 2000 -- has caused a surge in computer surveillance.
Paying employees to bid on eBay, shop online, play
games, trade stocks or instant-message friends isn't
usually a corporate priority. So as the surf-at-work
trend has grown, so have strategies to deal with it.
"Companies are getting tougher,'' says Anthony
Whitehead, chief technology officer at Ottawa's Bajai
Inc., an Internet-monitoring software company. Just
three years ago, for example, only 33 per cent of Canadian
companies had Internet-use policies. Now, nearly 57
per cent have, Ipsos-Reid found.
Whitehead has seen business boom in the past few years
as companies wake up to the fact employees are taking
advantage of workplace computers despite widely publicized
office Internet policies. "You can create policies,''
Whitehead says, "but those policies are meaningless
if you aren't willing to enforce them."
For instance, during an audit of one Ottawa-area organization,
Bajai uncovered more than 640,000 hits to adult sites
in May 2001 alone. This, at a workplace with an Internet-use
policy and fewer than 5,000 employees.
"It makes some jaws drop. A lot of people would
like to believe this isn't happening," says Whitehead.
"These are all adults, they should know better.
They've all signed policies. This shouldn't be happening,
but it does."
Not surprising then, that enforcement is on the rise.
In 1997, 35 per cent of American companies monitored
employee online activity; by 2001, nearly 80 per cent
had started Web tracking, according to an American Management
Association study. As of 2001, some 14 million U.S.
workers -- one in three of the 40 million employees
with Internet access -- had their e-mail and Internet
use monitored at work, according to a 2001 study by
the non-profit group Privacy Foundation. Based on surveillance
software sales, an estimated 100 million workers worldwide
are monitored, the group reports.
|
|
Employees who take personal
Internet time at work feel such surveillance erodes
trust, not to mention morale. "I think people work
better if they feel free to be able to do that kind
of thing," says a public library employee who requested
anonymity to protect her job.
She admits to spending an hour each day cruising sites
like Hotmail.com, Chapters.ca and Epicurious.com, but
doesn't think it is a problem. "I would never not
be doing work I needed to be doing in order to do stuff
for personal gain," she says, "but if I've
got a moment in the day that is quiet, I'll go check
my e-mail, or go and check for that book I've been meaning
to buy, or I'll go find a recipe to make for dinner."
Other workers interviewed for this story say employers
have no more right to track personal e-mail than to
listen in on personal telephone conversations. If employees
are routinely cyberslacking, they say, it's likely the
company's fault for not managing properly. "People
should be too busy to have oodles of time to surf the
Web," said one worker.
But companies counter that even if only a few workers
are misusing the Internet, abuse can damage a company's
reputation and bottom line.
Corporations can be held liable if employees download
illegal material such as child pornography, if they
violate copyright, or harass a co-worker via e-mail.
In the U.S., for example, Morgan Stanley was sued for
$70 million U.S. after racist jokes were circulated
on its e-mail system. Last April, an Arizona company
paid a $1-million settlement to the recording industry
after it allowed employees to swap MP3s. In Ontario,
more than 60 O.P.P. officers and Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources staff were investigated in July 2001
for exchanging pornography and racist e-mails on the
government's system. Some 40 officers were disciplined,
demoted or docked pay, while six ministry employees
were fired.
Employers are also worried about staff releasing confidential
information on the Internet, either deliberately or
accidentally.
Preserving network bandwidth is also a top priority
-- large audio and video file downloads slow down the
network. Instead of upgrading the system, some employers
are downgrading employees' access and blocking such
files. That tactic would have been useful at the Canada
Customs and Revenue Agency in 2000 when e-mail chain
letters holding large files twice crashed the network.
Surf Police
CEOs are responding to this threat to productivity
and security. "People are spending lots of time
on the Internet and it is becoming addictive,"
says CEO Sundara Murthy of Ottawa's Sigpro Wireless.
Instant messaging, he says, is a scourge to productivity.
"Chatlines are a disease. Many new graduates are
addicted to that. We measure our employees' output and
productivity so if that suffers we know they are whiling
away their time with this."
Upon hiring, his company makes employees agree to a
policy which forbids illegal and personal use, but he's
aware it still happens. Murthy hasn't felt the need
to install monitoring software yet, but he holds a hardline
philosophy: companies should use everything in their
arsenal to prevent abuse -- from monitoring software
to shutting Internet access off entirely. At Sigpro,
he's taken a proactive approach. He's put most of the
information employees need on the company Intranet so
they stay on the internal system which protects against
personal surfing and limits exposure to viruses.
ZIM Technologies International
employees sign an agreement, and with the help of software,
spam, pornography and MP3 sites are blocked and e-mails
are scanned for viruses and content. "I'm finding
more than 95 per cent of the time it's accidental,"
says director of Information Services Jamie Larabie
of the porn Web hits he sees. "For example, if
you go to whitehouse.com instead of whitehouse.gov all
of a sudden -- boom! -- you're on a porn site."
|